I don’t know if I’m more annoyed January 2018 will be more than SIXTEEN years since 9/11 and TWELVE since the act was passed – guess this wasn’t all that urgent after all – or that these states still aren’t in compliance with something they knew was coming.
In the end, it will be the average citizen who suffers because of this and gets bumped from a flight. (Drama at the airport… that’s what’s missing from our lives.) Either having to miss a business trip, family reunion, wedding, or heaven forbid, the funeral of a loved one all because government bureaucracy can never seem to get it right… or done in a timely manner.
Can I scream now?
Travelers, don’t say we didn’t warn you. Beginning in January 2018, driver’s licenses from some states may be rejected as a form of identification for boarding an aircraft.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA), while gradually implementing the REAL ID Act passed by Congress in 2005, has announced that starting next year it cannot accept some state driver’s licenses that don’t meet acceptable security standards
Residents of nine states — Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Washington — may need to use a passport or some other government-approved identification unless their driver’s licenses are changed by next year. Other states have been granted extensions while they prepare to comply with the requirement.
Signs have been placed near checkpoints in some airports to notify passengers of the changing requirements.
“This doesn’t mean that people will be told, ‘Hey, you can’t fly,’” a TSA spokesman said on Wednesday. “You’ll just have to have another form of ID.”
Some states have raised privacy concerns, saying the ID requirements may produce information on individuals that can be compiled in a national database. “This is a game of intimidation being played out between Congress and the federal government and state governments, with ordinary citizens being squeezed in the middle,” Edward Hasbrouck of the Identity Project, a privacy advocate, told the New York Times in December.
The REAL ID Act was based on recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to guard against terrorist attacks. Proponents say more stringent IDs may also ward off fraud and identity theft.